- Brush and floss your teeth in the morning and the evening
- Wash your face and apply age-relevant creams twice daily
- Make your bed
- Drink half your body weight in ounces of water
- Track and fulfill your ideal macros
- Walk 10,000 steps
- Lift weights to support your cardio
- Meditate and find mental calmness (practice gratitude)
- Get fresh air and vitamin D
- Learn or study something new
- Hold a meaningful career
- Read a book
- Have a hobby
- Plan for your future
- Touch grass
- Shop local
- Engage with your community
- Cultivate relationships
- Keep a tidy home
- Limit screen time
- Get 8 hours of sleep
- Stick to a routine
Friday, November 14, 2025
There are 24 Hours in a Day
Tuesday, November 4, 2025
Just Watch It
Rotten Tomatoes, MetaCritic, IMDb, Reddit, coworkers, friends, baristas, randos in your Instagram Explore page. It's easy to analyze something death before you've even experienced it and I think it's skewing our enjoyment levels.
Don't get me wrong, a quick glance at a review site to see if it's a total bomb may be worthwhile; but reading multiple articles that dissect the plot, rate the costuming, and point out personal hangups, is dangerous. What if they misinterpreted the plot? What if they're an expert in 18th century lower-class English textiles and the "horrendous error" they're calling out is something the layman would never notice? Then your view of this movie has been skewed by someone else's eyes.
I recently watched All of Us Strangers (2 years after its release). I knew vaguely that it was a love story, but genuinely nothing else. As the credits rolled, I blubbered for a solid 10 minutes, dried my eyes and sat for another 10 minutes thinking about the final few scenes. I won't post any spoilers but there was one scene which I felt was up for interpretation. I took to Reddit for some answers and what I came across was vehement declarations of love and hate for that scene: "it ruined the movie for me and made everything that came before it unimportant." Or, "that scene so perfectly encapsulated his journey; it was a perfect ending."
I clicked out of there pretty quickly and decided my opinion was all that mattered in this moment. This movie is about the human condition, and its story (I believe) is strengthened by the individual lenses of the unique viewers. Perhaps the Reddit folks were looking to engage in discussion rather than declarative statements, but the responses were not answering the call. I'd love to hear people's opinions on a few moments, but I don't want someone declaring the movie good or bad because of how they viewed a specific scene.
Additionally recommended viewing material: My Dinner with Andre. Two distant friends have an extended conversation on life's idiosyncrasies, from romance, to art, to technology, both share and point/counterpoint each other's observations. No man is right or wrong as it's only through our individual experiences that we have an opinion at all.
Thursday, May 29, 2025
It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World (Pt. 1)
Tuesday, February 11, 2025
Sunday, January 26, 2025
Musings on the Modern Novel
I am a reader. Not a voracious one, but I am a reader of maybe ten novels a year. I tend to alternate cycles between podcasts and books to whatever balance my schedule allows. I'm currently on the reading cycle and boy do I have some thoughts.
I just finished two books: The Sun Also Rises, by Earnest Hemingway, and The Women, by Kristin Hannah. Perhaps two more disparate books there were not. Maybe that's what brought me here today to exercise my thoughts.
The Sun Also Rises was my first foray into Hemingway. All I knew of him was Paris, The Lost Generation, and masculinity; I was going in near blind to his actual writing style. What I discovered on his pages was emotion, vulnerability (even in a characters inability to be vulnerable), consideration, fear, love, worry, self-preservation, exploration, comfort, and some version of friendship. The story was real, even when the characters were being fake. The story was honest, even when the characters were not, and as much was said between the lines as in them. I was with Jake on all his travels and I believed in all his decisions and actions.
The Women was my third Kristin Hannah novel. I enjoyed The Nightingale, The Four Winds was ok, I loathed The Women. The Women is billed as the untold story of the women serving in Vietnam who did so much for our country but who got no credit, respect, or status upon return home after their tours, and who are still, in 2025, not often discussed or featured in Vietnam War stories. I don't know too much about the war - pretty much what film and TV has shown me - so I thought this would be a great place to jump in.
Wow. This book was awful. It was a romance novel disguised as a real novel. Hannah spent 3 pages describing the emotions her main character felt when a man touched the small of her back, and one measly paragraph on the eight hours of triage medical aid the character provided after a mass casualty event at one of the wars bloodiest bases.
This whole book felt like Hannah read some Wikipedia pages and turned it into a book. Nothing was explored in depth, nothing felt like it had real stakes, nothing felt earned. Every problem this character had was solved in the following chapter and then a new one started up that was solved in the chapter after that.
For this book to be celebrated as a feminist account of the strength of women in the Vietnam War is bollocks. The main character in this book didn't make a single decision of her own - every fulcrum point decision in this woman's life was made by a man (except the very last one to move to Montana).
In just 250ish pages, Hemingway took me to Paris and Spain in the 1920s and showed me the mood, the tension, the sensibilities, the culture, the weather and the people of the locales he visited. In 480+ pages, Hannah merely told me some headline going-ons of the Vietnam War and its fallout, but managed to smother me with relentless description of 20 year old romance.
I'll be sticking to the classics for a little bit...or maybe hoping back over to Podcast land.
Monday, June 12, 2023
Can You See the Real Me?
Sunday, April 2, 2023
Take Joy Where You Can Find It
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
If I Were Volkswagen...
Wednesday, November 9, 2022
Jill Taylor, the 2022 Fashion Influencer from 1997
![]() |
| Home Improvement, 1991-1999 |
What really struck me was the changing fashion of series mom, Jill Taylor. Seasons 1-3 did her dirty; we're talking shapeless sack dresses in fade-away beige, hide-my curves cardigans, drab haircuts and shoes better suited for working assembly lines. By season 4, her character is pursuing a masters degree in psychology and reconnecting with herself as a person outside of being a mother and this is where we see a bit of style creep into her looks. A style that has found its way back onto the racks of clothing stores everywhere in 2022 - only this time, the looks are being worn by women 20 years younger than the formidable 40-something.
Take a look at some of these fits and then go peep the kids at your local mall. Actually, where do kids hang out these days cause it sure as heck can't be the mall?
![]() |
| A 90s icon, the loose fit overalls with a white tee |
![]() |
| Another 90s winner, the oversized flannel |
![]() |
| A nice corduroy shacket over a basic tee |
![]() |
| A cropped shacket and the source code for seemingly all jeans today: the faded mom jean |
![]() |
| A baby tee under a body-con mini dress with chunky loafers - very Cher Horowitz |
![]() |
| Keeping it fresh with crisp white sneaks and exposed socks |
![]() |
| The casual professional pairing a fitted blazer with a striped tee and of course, mom jeans |
![]() |
| Literally the most ubiquitous outfit on the Instagram fashion accounts these days |
![]() |
| Vests for the preppy-types |
![]() |
| Vests for the artsy-types |
![]() |
| Vests for when your t-shirts are all dirty |

























